User:Rmhermen
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 61622 |
Edits+Deleted | 64817 |
Pages deleted | 3955 |
Revisions deleted | 14 |
Pages restored | 30 |
Pages protected | 80 |
Pages unprotected | 9 |
Protections modified | 23 |
Users blocked | 101 |
Users reblocked | 1 |
User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 94.136.188.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 965 five times in the last 5 minutes (Indo-Aryan expletives, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- 49.196.91.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 5.64.200.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing by edit warring and making what may be legal threats. PatGallacher (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Or use WP:ANI if you want to make a combined report including the possible legal threats. This report is also quite stale, the account hasn't edited since 18 July. And there's already a report on WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- RicFlairWOOwoo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
ZezeHoldDAT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Two Sockpuppet accounts of ScholarMate1, H3r3cookiecookie38, and ZipthatChop has evaded their block again and is vandalizing the Hausa people and Sudanese Arabs page after just being blocked again from their previous sockpuppet account 3 days ago. The User as usual has also sent messages at my talk page claiming they have a cited source when they clearly don't.[1] User is not here to build an encyclopedia. Cookiemonster1618 (talk 02:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) - 2C0F:FC89:80AD:B99C:1:0:24EE:CFFB (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Username1947292 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Xylan P Ladista from Zippy Roadside Inc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Indicated a desire to make a WP:COI article about themselves. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 15:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sockpuppetry, disruptive editing. See page history. C F A 💬 00:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Consistent IP Arabic-speaking (or at the very least, Arabic text-inserting) vandals to this article in recent months (a string of Arabic slurs in November 2023, then again in June of this year). Special:Diff/1228712910, Special:Diff/1228550766, Special:Diff/1187156350. I can translate what was being inputted here, but among other things, the subject of the article was being called a Kafir. Semi protecting will surely turn the tide against vandalism here. Most recent constructive editors have been registered users. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism from multiple addresses (though I'm 90% sure it's the same person) PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 01:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs keep deliberately adding misinformation. C F A 💬 01:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Note that they don't seem at all deterred by the existing PC protection. Frankly, we've already given them enough WP:ROPE. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Pending protection was imposed literally 8 years ago by acalamari. It seemed to be applicable until February 2023 when disruptive edits arose. The incident resulted in a week-long protection, followed by a 3-month long protection, followed by a 3-day long protection before being resorted to a year long protection. Well, the year long protection recently expired, only to allow the same disruption. Wouldn't that have already defeated the purpose of PC? Why in the world do we have to wait for another year before the decision to reset pending changes is approved?197.2.212.136 (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: @197.2.212.136: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, Bot! You need a larger language model. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- This doesn't make much sense, but I think you mean that pending changes settings should be removed because the page is also extended confirmed protected. I agree BombCraft8 (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- The usual reason we leave PC in place underneath semi and EC is as fallback for editors to cope with disruption after a protection expires ... often admins don't have W-Ping and forget that protections they set have expired. The only reason I would remove it under ECP is if the protection were to be made indefinite, eliminating that issue.
I also think that we are overdue for bringing back PC2, which now would be applied to auto-confirmed editors as well (and perhaps automatically semi-protecting the page in the process), which would also solve this problem. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- The usual reason we leave PC in place underneath semi and EC is as fallback for editors to cope with disruption after a protection expires ... often admins don't have W-Ping and forget that protections they set have expired. The only reason I would remove it under ECP is if the protection were to be made indefinite, eliminating that issue.
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Protection no longer needed over a decade. 49.150.14.10 (talk) 22:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Unfortunately, these "zoo animal" articles need to be protected due to continual vandalism and previous unprotection attempts on similar articles have failed. All of these are semi-protected: alligator, giraffe, lion, tiger, elephant, zebra, bear, shark, wolf, leopard, cheetah, and many more. You might consider registering an account so you can edit articles like this in the future. If you don't want to register an account, you can also make an edit request on the article talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
0 protected edit requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC) |
15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for accountcreator |
---|
Account creator[edit]
Hello! Wikipedians, I'm S-Aura with over three years of experience and extended confirmed user rights. I'd like to request an account creation on Wikipedia. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, may I request an autopatrolled role? While I have created only 15 articles, most of them have have been fully expanded with plenty of sources to support all information in them. I almost entirely cover paleontological taxa such as Diplobune, Dacrytherium, Mixtotherium, and more; I also cover lengthy taxonomic history as shown in the research history of Anoplotherium, research history of Mammut, and the research history of Palaeotherium. Thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hello good day, may I request the autopatroller rights? Although I just have 17 articles so far of course one is deleted. I mostly write biographies, movies, and history. These articles are free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Thank you. |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie (talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I'm Bugnawfang. Lately, I have been editing on articles about some places in the Philippines. Recently, however, the Negros Island Region was created again after a law was signed by the president of the Philippines. Hence, there are 19 cities and 44 municipalities' pages that still have the old "Central Visayas (Region VII)" and "Western Visayas (Region VI)" region template tags. I am aware that my edits do not meet the threshold, but I do want to update these pages, and making edits one-by-one on these pages is tedious on its own. With this, I may request for the permission to use AWB to add the "Negros Island Region" template on these pages. Bugnawfang (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Been on hiatus for a couple of years and my access was revoked. I used to enjoy using the typo fixing facility and might like to try it again. John (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
I would like to be able to edit more pages to expand the wiki Irindu10 (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Unflagged bot under test hitting editfilters. Requesting confirmed rights to prevent this, and to allow clerking of Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2. See BRFA. Mdann52 (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I am requesting confirmed rights because I am trying to create a new page however I can't do that without confirmed/auto- confirmed permissions. Pemguincraft (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I've been editing since 2022 and have not committed any instances of valdalism, the odds of me reaching 500 edits anytime soon is very unlikely (I am currently at ~320). In order to edit extended confirmed articles such as the 2024 United States presidential election, I need this privilege. Thank you for considering my request. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 22:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I am the alt account of 48JCL, I will log into it (I am in a public library right now) for proof. 48JCL public (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to able to participate in the discussion on this talk page. As I feel the article has non neutrally written content in it (which also have inciteful implications) time is of the essence. I'm participating in good faith and I would only need it for a short period (probably not more than a few days) and only for that talk page. Emdosis (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I meet the criteria but am not in the extended confirmed group. Amisom (talk) 23:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Good day. I am requesting to be granted the New Page Reviewer permission to assist with the growing new page backlog. I have created 8 new articles (although one was a complete rewrite that I then pushed through AfC) and meet the edit and age requirements for this permission. I also have demonstrated experience in the AfC process in both articles and redirects and have some experience in deletion related areas. I maintain rollback and pending change permissions, both of which I use regularly. I believe I can (and will) be of assistance in reducing the NPP backlog, if given the opportunity. Thank you. Garsh (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Ahola .O (talk) 10:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hello good day, may I request a new page reviewer? While I have created only 17 articles (one deleted), I have spent more than 90 days with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. If granted this right, it will make my edits easier. Thank you.
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I've been a rollbacker for some time now, and when I patrol the recent changes, it's not at all uncommon to come across pending revisions. Thus, I imagine that having the permission of a pending changes reviewer would help me in anti-vandalism activities and, even more, reduce the backlog and the work of other volunteers. Helping directly on Special:PendingChanges is also a possibility, of course. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Wikipedia editor who has an entire month of experience with counter-vandalism, and I also make many copyedits. I would like to stop vandalism in its crib by being a pending changes reviewer and stopping vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I know what is vandalism and what isn't, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies, including Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have read WP:Copyrights and I have read the guideline on reviewing. I am also in process of receiving rollback permissions, and you can see the discussion there too. Thanks, Apollogetticax|talk 04:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello! I would like to have the rollback permission to revert vandalism quicker and to use tools like Huggle. Also, with Awesome Aasim's RC patrol tool, reverting is very slow, but with rollback it will be much faster. I use Twinkle already. I am keen in the field of anti-vandalism. While my track record isn't exactly the best, I acknowledge my mistakes, and improve on them. I can tell what is and what isn't vandalism, and I know to always warn users, no exception. While edit counts don't matter, I have over 250 mainspace edits (just for the record). This also brings light to my experience. I have been doing counter-vandalism since the day I created my account. If you think I am doing anything wrong, you are free to tell me my mistakes, and I can fix myself. | Apollogetticaxtalk 23:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to request rollback rights as I've been pretty active in countering vandalism since May. I use Twinkle and I notify new users consistently when I revert, usually by using a warn template, but other times by writing a message myself. I do my best to distinguish between good faith edits and vandalism and avoid unnecessary edit wars. Having made around 20 successful AIV reports, I am interested in making patrolling quicker with Huggle. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 22:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, at this point I think I’m ready to fight vandalism and make good rollback edits, I really need this tools to be giving me to me, I’m an experienced editor and I think some editors are really not doing justice in terms of there edits, I want to use the tools to revert some edits that shouldn't be Madeforall1 (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying for the role of rollbacker, having been a Wikipedia user for over 10 years and being increasingly active in the last few years. In this vein, I feel that I have undone my fair share of vandalism and, being mainly focused on football/sports articles, vandalism and unconstructive/unsourced edits are very common in my area of interest and editing. I believe that these rights will be very useful in maximising the efficiency of my work on Wikipedia and will save me time from undoing separate edits individually. Additionally, I have past experience as an administrator on a Wikia project, where I made use of the rollback feature and have good knowledge of its positives and when to utilise it. Thank you for taking your time to review my request. Kind regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]
I'm requesting template editor privileges due to recent changes that classify parts of the Template:Occupation_by_nationality_and_century_category_header as high risk [6]. I developed this template to help manage occupation categories and have become quite familiar with template syntax over the past year, though I do not consider myself an expert. My expertise lies more in R programming, which I teach as part of a data science class. I meet nearly all the requirements for template editor privileges, except for having syntax requests implemented in other high-risk templates. While I have edited templates that have become high risk, I acknowledge that this is not the same. However, I have made a sizable number of technical contributions to RegExTypoFix, primarily in optimizing the regular expression. This is the code underlying the spellchecker used by AWB to implement uncontroversial misspellings. If necessary, I am willing to find and suggest syntax changes to further demonstrate my capabilities. Mason (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm requesting template editor permission for some edits related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships. I meet all of the guidelines and have held template editor permission in the past (see Special:UserRights/RP88 and Special:PermaLink/805154993 for original grant), but previous template editor permission was dropped during a period of inactivity on my part. I am not sure if it is relevant to en.WP, but as a Commons administrator I have made hundreds of edits to the restricted templates/modules in the Commons Module and Template namespaces. —RP88 (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC) |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
WP:AIV | WP:ANI | WP:NPP | WP:RPP | WP:RFR | WP:AFD | WP:XFD | |||||||||||||
CAT:CSD | WP:CSD | WP:RM | WP:RAA | WP:DR | WP:TM | WP:TT | |||||||||||||
WP:RCU | WP:LOP | CAT:AB | WP:BS | WP:RD | WP:NFC | WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [8] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system