User talk:Gary

Flag of Canada

Hi Gary, good to see you're editing. You nominated this one at WP:FAC a long time ago. I'm thinking of rerunning this one at WP:TFA on July 1 ... the article seems to me to be in pretty good shape. Any thoughts pro or con? - Dank (push to talk) 06:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead, sounds good. Gary (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. The tool User:Phlsph7/HighlightUnreferencedPassages.js pointed out that the last paragraph, about Settlers, Rails & Trails, is unreferenced. Do you happen to have a reference? Would you rather pull it if we can't find a reference? - Dank (push to talk) 19:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Nope, I don't have a reference for that. You can remove it, if you want. Gary (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Just a reminder that this is coming up on July 1. - Dank (push to talk) 21:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, and all who helped, today for the 2008 article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pokémon Diamond and Pearl

Pokémon Diamond and Pearl has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 48JCLTALK 01:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

"Xavier Ribes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Xavier Ribes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 6 § Xavier Ribes until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Guitar Hero

Guitar Hero has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rails Day

The article Rails Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced page on a non-notable programming language contest. Effectively unchanged for many years. Fails WP:GNG, no usable coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)