Jump to content

Talk:Richard Strauss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Much improved article

[edit]

I hadn't looked at this article for quite some time and am delighted and impressed how much it has been improved since I last saw it. I had it on my to-do list but have now removed it as no longer needing upgrading, IMO. Has/have the main author(s) considered putting it up for peer review with a view to taking it to GAN or FAC? I think it deserves it. Tim riley talk 20:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. @4meter4: any plans? Aza24 (talk) 06:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tim riley: and @Aza24: I hadn’t considered it, but I might based on this suggestion. Thanks for noticing my work.4meter4 (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"better source needed" tag on Strauss quote

[edit]

There's a quote from Strauss's journals that now has a "better source needed" tag on it (added by Michael Bednarek June 2020: [1]).

The episode of Exploring Music it is cited to can currently be listened to free online (labeled Friday, June 14, 2024) for the next 13 days at https://www.wfmt.com/programs/exploring-music/. The quote is at about one-and-a-half minutes in.

I'd like to remove the tag since it's checkable right now, and also the "Richard Strauss" series gets re-aired on Exploring Music approximately every four years (and is listenable for two weeks online each time).

From May 2013 to sometime in late 2019, Exploring Music also had a listen-on-demand archive of all of its past episodes. The last Wayback capture of on-demand streaming of the "Richard Strauss" series is August 2018: [2] (no longer listenable, but describes each episode).

Bill McGlaughlin writes his own scripts and does extensive research for every episode, as noted in Exploring Music#Production and distribution.

I've been unable to find the quote in a Google search -- although there are many dozens of English-language biography books on Strauss, Google currently does not offer either previews or snippets of the overwhelming majority of them. Softlavender (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are no problems with sources that verify a quotation but are no longer available. I suggest you update the URL and access-date and title/label of that reference, as well as indicating the time of the quote. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK done, thanks. I'll keep an eye out for any books I come across physical copies of that may also include it (particularly if the books predate 2004). I have ordered a copy of the Tim Ashley book you mentioned in your rationale; the snippet on GoogleBooks shows he doesn't quote the whole thing but he may have a footnote that gives the exact date of the journal entry, etc. BTW, I prefer to title the week-long radio series "Richard Strauss" rather than "Strauss, Richard", because the title these series are announced as is the composer's normal name, not surname+forename. I have also Wayback-saved the link and added access-date to the ref. Softlavender (talk) 01:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image missing when hovering on him on another page

[edit]

I just changed his main image to one that is more accurate. However, when I hover over Richard Strauss on another article the image isn't showing up. I'm guessing this has to do with the image size, but I don't know how to fix it. Could someone help out? Wikieditor662 (talk) 09:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see this only after I reverted the image to the state before, and addressing the issue on your talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swapping his main portrait

[edit]

I propose we swap Richard Strauss' main image from his portrait into his real life picture as it is more accurate and I believe choosing the more accurate image is more important than the better one. What do you guys think? Wikieditor662 (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current picture (painting) doesn't seem like a bad option to me, but i agree that swapping it for an appropiate photograph could be an improvement. This one (1910 postcard) or that one (unknown year pic) seem like good candidates. There are others available here. — Gor1995 𝄞 17:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]