Talk:Generation Z
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Generation Z)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Generation Z article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Due to the frequent edit-warring that has occurred in the Date and age range section of this article, any proposed additions/removals/non-minor changes to the section should be first discussed at Talk:Generation Z/sandbox. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merges. Click [show] to reveal | |||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
This page is missing loads
[edit]I see paragraphs of female gen z interests like fanfiction but where is opium? Ken Carson? Nettspend? Phonk? Gym culture?? This page makes me and my generation as a whole feel underrepresented on this website and I find it quite demeaning… I would gladly edit these facts in with citations and sources however the page is protected 2A01:B340:63:BE47:E08B:C750:95C4:99C7 (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- damn! u aint even lying 78.16.52.197 (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- None of the 'interests' that you've mentioned above pertain to the majority of Generation Z. In fact, much of what you mentioned sounds like it is an interest of a small fraction of Generation Z.
- Zillennial (talk) 20:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Late 90s?
[edit]Who keeps changing the top part and say late 90s?
its abritary. A few popular sources start gen z in 1995
https://mccrindle.com.au/article/topic/generation-z/gen-z-and-gen-alpha-infographic-update/
https://www.c-span.org/classroom/document/?20837 1.132.24.174 (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- It isn't arbitrary. Majority of sources that quote the term "Generation Z" in 2024 use a starting date of 1997. Yes, there are some sources that use the start years of 1995, or 1996, but they are not widely used. That is why the word "generally" is included above.
- Those two sources you've provided are either a year old (C-Span) while the other one (Mark McCrindle) has not been updated since 2020. Look at the infographic chart, it states the smart speakers are "new".
- Zillennial (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- To be fair he/she completely right you can’t go kicking people out when you feel like it 🤡
- here is a updated source that uses 1995 as the start
- its 100% abritary
- https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/25/realestate/rental-homes-millennials-gen-z.html Wrldfait (talk) 07:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Wrldfait
- As mentioned above, even though there are occasional sources that use 1995 or 1996 it does not mean that it's a widely considered or accepted viewpoint. You're ignoring that the word "generally" is used in the header, and there are also still mentions of earlier start years under the Date and age range portion of the Wikipedia article.
- Please also refrain from personal attacks. As per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable if you continue to persist with this behavior, administrators will be notified.
- Zillennial (talk) 02:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class geography articles
- Mid-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- B-Class Statistics articles
- Low-importance Statistics articles
- WikiProject Statistics articles